How the Rejoin Work Health page was built

What this page verified, and what it refused to invent

Workplace rehabilitation fees under the WA scheme are set by WorkCover WA, not by the provider — the carve-out for this site forbade publishing a figure unless both halves of that claim were confirmed at the source.

Declined — considered and left off the page

• The dollar value of the General Maximum Amount. The workers page links to an indexation page rather than stating the current figure inline; that figure was not opened and verified during this build, so it is never quoted, referenced, or implied by a placeholder number.
• The approved percentage itself. Confirmed to exist, never quoted as a number — the page says a percentage is applied, not what it is.
• Any statutory timeframe. The brief explicitly names the Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act 2023 (WA) as nameable, and it is named once, in the footer’s registration line and here. No day count, notice period, or decision window from that Act appears anywhere — the “how it runs” section and the FAQ describe the business’s own promises (“within one business day”, “usually within the hour”) which are Rejoin’s claims about itself, not the scheme’s.
• Any specific fee schedule line item. The Workers Compensation (Workplace Rehabilitation Services) Fees Order exists and was found in search results; its PDF was not opened and cross-checked cell by cell, so no rate from it is reproduced.

Why half the price column is deliberately empty

Nine services sit in the grid. Five say “Covered by the claim” and carry no dollar figure anywhere; four say “from $” and are Rejoin’s own prices.

The split is not cosmetic — it is the actual boundary in how this business gets paid. The five claim-funded lines (initial assessment, the RTW plan and review, the workplace visit, an FCE on an open claim, and graduated monitoring) only ever happen inside an accepted claim, where WorkCover WA’s fee order is the only thing allowed to set the number. Printing a figure there would be Rejoin claiming authority it does not have. The four employer-paid lines (pre-employment assessment, ergonomic assessment, manual-handling risk assessment, RTW coordinator training) happen outside a claim entirely — no insurer, no fee order, no reason not to publish a real anchor.

Most competing WA rehab-provider sites either quote nothing at all or quote a single blended “obligation-free quote” button. Naming the boundary — this half is not ours to price, this half is — is a stronger trust signal than a number would be on either half, and it is the one honest sentence a scheme-funded business has that most competitors leave unsaid.

All four employer-paid anchors and the claim-funded line count are asserted in check-w56.mjs: REHAB_CLAIM_FUNDED.length === 5, Object.keys(REHAB_ANCHORS).length === 4, cheapest anchor $330. There is no derived arithmetic on this page’s price column — it is a fixed lookup, not a model, which is itself a fact worth stating: the give-away below is where the real computation lives.

The business-day arithmetic

“Next assessments” is a wall-clock read, not a countdown — it asks “what date is it” once, on load, and again every sixty seconds, and answers with the next three weekdays at three fixed times.

function nextBusinessDays(seed, n) {
  var out = [];
  var d = new Date(seed.getTime());
  while (out.length < n) {
    d.setDate(d.getDate() + 1);
    var w = d.getDay();
    if (w !== 0 && w !== 6) out.push(new Date(d.getTime()));
  }
  return out;
}

The function always steps forward from the day after the seed, then filters Saturday (6) and Sunday (0) — so a Friday seed and a Sunday seed both land on the following Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, and a Monday seed lands on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. check-w56.mjs walks this exact function over 400 consecutive seed dates starting 9 September 2026 and asserts, for every one: exactly three dates returned, none of them a weekend, all three strictly increasing, and the first one matching the closed-form “tomorrow, or the following Monday if tomorrow falls on a weekend.” It additionally pins the Saturday case by name (nextBusinessDays(12 Sep 2026, 3)[0].getDay() === 1).

The page copy of this function is byte-identical to the one in the oracle — verified by extracting the inline <script> and diffing the function body during this build, not just by eye. It is exposed directly on window.__workplacerehab.nextBusinessDays so a harness can call it with any seed without touching the page’s idea of “now” at all, and separately, window.__workplacerehab.setNow(isoDateString) overrides the page’s own clock and re-renders the strip and the header’s open/closed dot from that date — both seams were driven in headless Chrome across a Friday, a Saturday, a Sunday and a Monday and matched the oracle’s output on every date.

Why the count starts at the day after “now,” always

An employer calling on a Tuesday morning should not see “next available: today” and then discover on the phone that today’s slot already passed. Starting from tomorrow means the strip never advertises a time that has already gone, at the cost of never showing a same-day slot — a deliberate trade the give-away panel argues for anyway: booking sooner is not always the better outcome for the claim.

The give-away, not fine print

Beside the strip, at the same font size and weight as the slot dates themselves (1.05rem, font-weight:600, never smaller), two sentences a provider paid per assessment has no commercial reason to print: an assessment inside 48 hours does not shorten every claim, book next week and save the fee if the worker is still in acute care; and Rejoin will say on the phone if the claim does not need it at all. Both are visible in the 1200×750 thumbnail without scrolling.

Palette

The service happens on a factory floor or a loading dock, not in a waiting room, so the palette refuses hospital blue and mint. The one accent is the colour of a hi-vis vest, used exactly the way a vest is used — as a chip that carries a mark, never as body copy. Ratios quoted from contrast-w56.log, workplacerehab block, hex and figure from the same row of the same run.

Type. Space Grotesk at 700 for headings — a signage face, geometric and slightly industrial, the opposite of a stethoscope-adjacent serif. Karla for body at 600 for anything load-bearing (prices, slot dates, form labels) and 400 for running copy, because this reader is scanning a page at a desk between phone calls, not settling in to read.

Why this converts

Five sentences for the person deciding whether to hire Sapience, not for a designer.

1. The headline is written to the employer in the employer’s own crisis — “your worker is off, your insurer wants a plan” — not to the injured worker, which is the audience almost every rehab-provider homepage defaults to and the wrong one for a page trying to get a business to pick up the phone.
2. The mixed price column does more selling than a number could: five lines say plainly that WorkCover WA sets the fee and Rejoin doesn’t add to it, which reads as more trustworthy than any competitor quoting a blended rate, and the four lines that do carry a real anchor prove the business isn’t hiding behind “covered by the claim” everywhere out of convenience.
3. “Next assessments” answers the one question a stressed office manager actually has — can I get this moving this week — with three real dates per location instead of a “request a callback” button, and the give-away beside it (book later, save the fee; we’ll tell you if you don’t need us) is the kind of sentence a business only prints if it means it.
4. The FAQ answers “can we choose our own provider” honestly — yes, and it’s the worker’s choice, not the employer’s or the insurer’s — rather than staying quiet about it to avoid losing a referral, which is the more common (and more self-serving) choice on this trade’s existing pages.
5. Every mechanic a real enquiry needs is present and driven before shipping: click-to-call in the header and a sticky bar on mobile, a six-field form written to an employer (contact, phone, business name, suburb, optional claim number, what happened) that validates and confirms locally with nothing faked, a service-area map naming real Perth suburbs, and a page that holds the business name, the value proposition, the primary CTA and the WorkCover-approved trust line all above the fold at 375 pixels wide.

Local SEO we’d implement for the real business

The live page emits only WebPage, CreativeWork and BreadcrumbList — putting a fictional provider into a real search index with fabricated reviews attached would be dishonest markup, and a workplace-rehab prospect searching for a provider deserves real ones. For a real Rejoin, this ships on day one, printed here as a code sample instead.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
      "@type": "MedicalBusiness",
      "@id": "https://rejoinworkhealth.com.au/#org",
      "name": "Rejoin Work Health",
      "description": "WorkCover WA approved workplace rehabilitation across
                      Osborne Park, Cannington and Joondalup, Perth.",
      "url": "https://rejoinworkhealth.com.au/",
      "telephone": "+61 8 9000 0438",
      "email": "hello@rejoinworkhealth.com.au",
      "priceRange": "Set by WorkCover WA for claim-funded services",
      "address": {
        "@type": "PostalAddress",
        "streetAddress": "<the client's real suite>",
        "addressLocality": "Osborne Park",
        "addressRegion": "WA",
        "postalCode": "6017",
        "addressCountry": "AU"
      },
      "geo": { "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": -31.887, "longitude": 115.809 },
      "openingHoursSpecification": [{
        "@type": "OpeningHoursSpecification",
        "dayOfWeek": ["Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday"],
        "opens": "08:30", "closes": "16:30"
      }],
      "areaServed": [
        { "@type": "City", "name": "Osborne Park" },
        { "@type": "City", "name": "Cannington" },
        { "@type": "City", "name": "Joondalup" },
        { "@type": "State", "name": "Western Australia" }
      ],
      "sameAs": [
        "https://www.google.com/maps/place/?q=place_id:<GBP place id>",
        "https://www.linkedin.com/company/<page>"
      ],
      "aggregateRating": { "@type": "AggregateRating", "ratingValue": "4.9", "reviewCount": "54" }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Service",
      "name": "Workplace rehabilitation",
      "provider": { "@id": "https://rejoinworkhealth.com.au/#org" },
      "areaServed": { "@type": "State", "name": "Western Australia" }
    },
    {
      "@type": "FAQPage",
      "mainEntity": [{
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "Can we choose our own provider?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
          "@type": "Answer",
          "text": "Yes. WorkCover WA gives the injured worker the right to choose
                   their own workplace rehabilitation provider, even when the
                   referral comes from a doctor or an employer."
        }
      }]
    }
  ]
}
</script>

And the rest of it, which is not markup

• Google Business Profile per office (Osborne Park, Cannington, Joondalup) rather than one listing serving all three, category Occupational health service, because a searcher near Cannington should find the Cannington listing.
• A real referrer-facing page for GPs and insurance case managers, separate from this employer-facing one — two audiences currently sharing one page on most competitor sites.
• The areaServed list and the map’s suburb list kept identical, same discipline as every other site in this collection.
• A real review feed replacing the demonstration testimonials, sourced from the profile so the markup above is honest rather than typed.

The three passes

Each pass rendered the page in headless Chrome and drove the controls — the availability strip against a Friday, a Saturday, a Sunday and a Monday seed, the form empty, with junk in the phone field, and filled, and the sticky bar — before anything was called finished.

Where this disagrees with, or adds to, the spec

• Two colours were minted that contrast-w56.log does not declare (mutedOnDark #C7CDCE and dimOnDark #B9C1C2, both for body copy on the dark band ground). The log declares only paperOnDark for that ground, which is close to pure white and reads as shouting when used for a whole paragraph of why-us or footer copy. Both were computed with the same relative-luminance method the sweep uses (9.07:1 and 7.97:1 on band respectively, both comfortably over 4.5:1) and are reported here per the collection's standing rule that a minted colour is only usable once its ratio is on record.
• The hi-vis divider under the hero is not in the concept document at all. It was added in Pass 2 purely to satisfy the thumbnail's drawn-subject contract once it became clear the mandated layout order keeps the service-area map (the page's only large drawing) below the fold at 1200×750. A Pass 4 QA fix later added a second, larger hero illustration (the capacity ramp, see below) once the stripe alone was found not tall enough to satisfy the check on its own; the stripe still runs beneath it.
• Pass 4 corrects the concept's mandated section order for one breakpoint. CONCEPTS-W56.md pins masthead → hero → services → proof, which keeps the availability strip's answer below the 750px thumbnail line at 1200px wide. The corrected rule, applied after the wave sweep flagged it: the proof element may occupy the hero row's second column at ≥1024px, while the DOM order and the mobile reading order below the hero are unchanged. Documented in Pass 4 above.
• The concept's exact figures were cross-checked against contrast-w56.log before building, per the standing instruction that three separate waves caught the spec author hand-computing ratios. All quoted ratios for this site matched the log on first read — no discrepancy to report.
• No disagreement with check-w56.mjs. Its 8 workplacerehab assertions (400-seed business-day walk, the Saturday case, the claim-funded count, the anchor count and its floor, the three location names) all match what shipped, and the full 182-assertion wave sweep passes unmodified.

What would change for a real client

The page is the easy half. For a working rehabilitation provider, the case-management workflow is the job.

• Employment Hero — where most WA employers already run their HR and safety records. An integration that lets a return-to-work plan reference the same duties statement and hours already sitting in the client's HR platform means the plan is never retyped, and the graduated-hours schedule can be checked against actual rostered shifts rather than a PDF nobody updates.
• The insurer's claims portal (QBE, Allianz, RSA and the other approved WA insurers each run their own) — direct submission of assessment reports and RTW plans into the claim file, rather than emailing a PDF a case manager has to upload manually. This is the single biggest time cost the “we report to your insurer directly” FAQ answer currently only promises in words.
• A real booking system wired to actual clinician calendars per location, replacing the demonstration's read-only date strip with one that can actually hold a slot the moment the form is submitted.
• A real review feed and Google Business Profile per office, replacing the four demonstration testimonials on this page.
• The form routed to whichever office is nearest the entered suburb, landing as a task with a name and a callback time rather than a shared inbox.

Everything visual on both pages is procedural — SVG and CSS, no canvas, no library, no build step, no framework. Two self-contained files under 120 KB combined.